Commonwealth v. Healey
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, C.J.
A jury in the Superior Court found the de-
fendant guilty of the sexual abuse of two sisters, whom we shall call Ann and Kim. On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial judge erred in three evidentiary rulings. We find no reversible error and affirm the convictions.
There was evidence in the Commonwealth’s case of the following facts. The defendant moved into the victims’ household in South Boston sometime after July, 1978. He lived there with the victims, their mother, Susan, and their brothers, James and Joey. The children called the defendant “Daddy” and “Dad.” The defendant acted as the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Di Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Commonwealth v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Commonwealth v. BorodineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. AndrewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Commonwealth v. ZukoskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LaSotaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. AlmeidaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. ForemanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. ManriqueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.