Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Foreman

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 11, 2001No. 99-P-2139PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKafker, J.

The defendant, Errol Foreman, went to the apartment of the mother of his soon-to-be-bom child and told her he wanted nothing more to do with her. An argument and altercation ensued, and the defendant was arrested and charged with assault and battery. Two days later, the victim sought and received a restraining order pursuant to G. L. c. 209A. At the assault and battery trial, at which the defendant was convicted *511by a jury, the Commonwealth introduced the 209A complaint, affidavit, and order arising out of the incident, which included printed statements regarding the court’s determination that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AlphasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  3. Frizado v. FrizadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. GilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Boston Herald, Inc. v. SharpeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. GallagherMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. ReddyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. BiorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. AbernathyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. DadsiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API