Legal Opinion

Brockman v. Caviness

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1940No. 6771PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

November 1, 1934, respondent Brockman executed and delivered his promissory note for the sum of $4,906.67 to one Charles E. Ball. To secure the payment of the note and interest Brockman gave both a real estate and chattel mortgage. The note and mortgages were later transferred and assigned to appellant Ella Ball. Brockman thereafter made default in the payment of the note. April 8, 1939, appellant commenced suit in the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, in and for Washington County, to foreclose the real estate mortgage. May 1, 1939, a decree of foreclosure was entered in favor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rein v. CallawayIdaho Supreme Court · 1901
  2. First Nat. Bank of Pocatello v. PolingIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Garrett v. SoucieIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Peterson v. Hailey National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Empire Copper Co. v. HendersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Haworth v. BerntsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Roos v. BelcherIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Stringer v. SwanstrumIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Adair v. FreemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Arens v. ScheeleIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API