Legal Opinion

Stringer v. Swanstrum

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1946No. 7262PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, C.J.

This is an action for specific performance of a contract and option to purchase certain real property situated in Clark county.

The facts are quite fully set forth in the findings of the court quoted hereinafter.

The cause was tried to the court without a jury. Orders denying motion to strike portions of the amended complaint and overruling demurrers to the same were entered. The court concluded that the contract of lease and option to purchase “was and is a valid contract” and respondent “has not forfeited his rights thereunder”; that, by accepting interest payment and payments of mortgage…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. BurcawIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Zezi v. LightfootIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Abercrombie v. StoddardIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Seeley v. Security National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hurst v. Idaho Iowa Lateral & Reservoir Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Graves v. CupicIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ellis v. ButterfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Stockmen's Supply Co. v. JenneIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Williamson v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Johnson v. BennionIdaho Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API