Legal Opinion

Rein v. Callaway

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1901PublishedCited by 29 opinions

APPEAL from District Court, Elmore County. In tbe case of Brown v. Bryan, 5 Idaho, 145, 51 Pae. 995, this court after full hearing decided that a power of sale in a mortgage cannot be exercised but that the mortgage must be foreclosed as provided by law. This decision is as applicable to chattel as to realty mortgages. A mortgagee cannot waive his -security and sue upon the debt. (First Nat.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from District Court, Elmore County. In tbe case of Brown v. Bryan, 5 Idaho, 145, 51 Pae. 995, this court after full hearing decided that a power of sale in a mortgage cannot be exercised but that the mortgage must be foreclosed as provided by law. This decision is as applicable to chattel as to realty mortgages. A mortgagee cannot waive his -security and sue upon the debt. (First Nat. Bank of Lewis-ton v. Williams, 2 Idaho, 670, 23 Pac. 552; Barbieri v. Ramelli, 84 Cal. 154, 23 Pac. 1086.) The relation between the mortgagee and the mortgagor is a peculiar one in those states, like…

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This action was brought to recover a deficiency alleged to be due after applying the proceeds of a sale of mortgaged chattel property in part payment of the debt secured by such mortgage. Among other facts, the complaint alleges: On April 20, 1895, the defendant, Callaway, being indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $1,700, executed and delivered to him his promissory note for that sum, and, to secure payment of the same, gave a chattel mortgage upon thirty-three *637sacks of wool. This mortgage contained the following provision: “It is hereby specifically agreed and understood that at any time…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Barbieri v. RamelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Brown v. WillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. First National Bank of Lewiston v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Porter v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Clark v. PaddockIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Barth v. ElyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. First Nat. Bank of Pocatello v. PolingIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Keever v. Nicholas Beers Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Forbush v. San Diego Fruit & Produce Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1928

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API