Goode v. Cummings

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one to set aside a will on account of undue influence and because the testatrix was of unsound mind. Defendants prevailed and plaintiffs appeal.

Complaint is made that the court erred in rejecting evidence, in finding generally for defendants and in overruling plaintiffs' motion for a new trial. What the rejected evidence was is not shown. It was not offered on the motion for a new trial, and, therefore, forms no basis for reversing the judgment. (R. S. 60-3004; Martin v. Ott, 114 Kan. 419, 424, 219 Pac. 275.) No new evidence…