Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Hill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1935No. 32,003PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*603The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This was an action by relatives of Charles A. Haldeman, deceased, against the administrators with will annexed of the estate of the deceased and the beneficiaries under the will and codicil of the deceased, to set aside the will and codicil because of the testamentary incapacity of the testator at the times he executed the will and codicil, and because the provisions of the will and codicil are in violation of the rule against perpetuities and restrictions upon alienation.

The will was executed on May 14, 1931, and the codicil on April 29,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wisner v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Klose v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Troutman v. DeBoissiere Odd Fellows' Orphans' Home & Industrial School Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Barnhill v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Treadwell v. BeebeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Zabel v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Springer v. SchnackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. Walker v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Asheville v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Gilpin v. BurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API