Legal Opinion

Heyen v. Garton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1930No. 28,994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

The appeal in this case is by the defendants from a judgment rendered against them on a note they plead as a set-off against a note of theirs held by the plaintiffs, assigning as error, (1) the admission of evidence tending to alter and vary the terms of written instruments, (2) the undisputed evidence conclusively shows the defendants were entitled to judgment on their set-off note, and (3) plaintiff Williams has no interest in the note constituting the plaintiff’s cause of action.

*454The plaintiffs brought an action on a note for $1,175…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Handrub v. GriffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Kaul v. American Independent Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Hoover v. Estate of HooverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. O'Keeffe v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. Gorrill ex rel. Chelsea Oil & Gas Co. v. GreenleesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GordonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. HockenbargerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Broadview Oil Co. v. LivengoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Laidler v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Hart v. WileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API