Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Easter

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1995No. 62399-6PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

— To comply with state and federal environmental standards, Weyerhaeuser Company agreed to invest $8.7 million in pollution control equipment to reduce effluent from its pulp mill in Cosmopolis, Washington. Weyerhaeuser also voluntarily adopted a plan to remove asbestos and PCB’s from the plant, at a cost of $18.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively. At issue is whether these anticipated costs of pollution control reduced the market value of the pulp mill and, as a consequence, reduced Weyerhaeuser’s property taxes.

Facts

The Mill

Weyerhaeuser built the Cosmopolis mill in 1957 to produce dry…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Folsom v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ozette Railway Co. v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Folsom v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Sahalee Country Club, Inc. v. Board of Tax AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Mason County Overtaxed, Inc. v. County of MasonWashington Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cascade Court Ltd. Partnership v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Almor Corp. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Schmidt v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Washington Beef, Inc. v. County of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Washington Beef, Inc. v. Yakima CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API