Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Easter
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
— To comply with state and federal environmental standards, Weyerhaeuser Company agreed to invest $8.7 million in pollution control equipment to reduce effluent from its pulp mill in Cosmopolis, Washington. Weyerhaeuser also voluntarily adopted a plan to remove asbestos and PCB’s from the plant, at a cost of $18.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively. At issue is whether these anticipated costs of pollution control reduced the market value of the pulp mill and, as a consequence, reduced Weyerhaeuser’s property taxes.
Facts
The Mill
Weyerhaeuser built the Cosmopolis mill in 1957 to produce dry…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Folsom v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Ozette Railway Co. v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Folsom v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Sahalee Country Club, Inc. v. Board of Tax AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Mason County Overtaxed, Inc. v. County of MasonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cascade Court Ltd. Partnership v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Almor Corp. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Schmidt v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Washington Beef, Inc. v. County of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Washington Beef, Inc. v. Yakima CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.