Ozette Railway Co. v. Grays Harbor County
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
— The purpose of these two actions, which were consolidated for trial and for appeal, was to recover alleged excessive taxes paid under protest by the respective plaintiffs during two successive years. Defendant in its amended answers denied the material allegations of the complaints, and by way of affirmative defense alleged that the actions had not been commenced within the time allowed by law. Upon a trial to the court without a jury, findings of fact were made from which the court concluded: (1) that the statute of limitations barred recovery of any portion of the taxes paid by plaintiffs…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In re Westlake AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Templeton v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Dexter Horton Building Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Donaldson v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- STATE EX REL. COSM. ETC. v. BrunoWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Maytag Company v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Narragansett Electric Co. v. MinardiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Morgan v. KinnearWashington Supreme Court · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.