Legal Opinion

Washington Beef, Inc. v. Yakima County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 14, 2008No. 25966-8-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Setting the value of assets for the purpose of assessing property taxes is more of an art than a science. And we review a trial judge’s findings following a trial for substantial evidence. The evidence here included testimony on the proper approach to valuation. The trial judge heard conflicting expert testimony from the county and the taxpayer on the appropriate method of valuing property. All experts here purported to provide the appropriate analytical tools to calculate the value of a beef processing plant for the purpose of assessing county ad valorem taxes. The trial judge rejected…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Cascade Court Ltd. Partnership v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sahalee Country Club, Inc. v. Board of Tax AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Holden v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Vonage America, Inc. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Holden v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In Re Tax Assessment of Foster Foundation's Woodlands Retirement CommunityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In Re Tax Assessment of Foster Foundation's Woodlands Retirement CommunityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API