Goist v. United States

OPINION

MARGARET M. SWEENEY, Judge.

Before the court in the above-captioned case are defendant’s motion for summary dismissal of plaintiffs complaint and defendant’s motion to quash plaintiffs subpoena. In his pro se complaint,1 plaintiff, in essence, alleges that United States failed to discharge a debt owed to it by plaintiff.2 For the reasons set forth below, the court grants defendant’s motion for summary dismissal, dismissing plaintiffs complaint for lack of jurisdiction. The court further finds that the complaint filed by plaintiff, a serial litigant, is frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…