Legal Opinion
Pitchford v. Electrical Workers' Benefit Ass'n
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 8, 1941No. 29681PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order which sustained a demurrer to the evidence of the plaintiff below and entered judgment in favor of defendant below. The parties appear here in the same order as they did in the trial court and will be referred to in like manner.
The essential facts are not in dispute. On March 3, 1931, the defendant issued and delivered to Charles Robert Pitch-ford, a member of its local lodge in Muskogee, a benefit certificate which contained the following provisions:
“That Charles Robert Pitchford, a Member of Local Lodge No. 384 of Muskogee, Okla. is, while in continuous good…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. GrimSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Phillips v. Henderson Gasoline Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. MosleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
3Cited by8 opinions
- Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Plaster v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- National Aid Life Ass'n v. MaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Harbour v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Bolding v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.