Legal Opinion

Diehl v. City of Shidler

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 21, 1944No. A-10308PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.

Defendant, Lawrence J. Diehl, was charged in the municipal court of the city of Shidler with the violation of a city ordinance; was tried, convicted and fined in the sum of $10 and costs, which amounted to $9.50; appealed to the, county court of Osage county where he was tried, convicted and assessed the same fine as in the municipal court. From this judgment he has appealed.

This case is the outgrowth of the alleged violation of an ordinance of the city of Shidler, in Osage county, known as an occupational tax ordinance. -The ordinance was passed by the city council on- July 7, 1933, after…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bradley v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Herren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Ex Parte BochmannCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Ex Parte MarlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Diehl v. City of ShidlerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API