Legal Opinion
In Re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 16, 2000No. CIV. A. 94-2502, No. MDL-1021PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Creative Copier Services (“CCS”) filed suit against Xerox Corporation, alleging that it violated the federal antitrust laws and state competition laws by refusing to sell copier parts to independent service organizations, tying its sale of parts and service, and disparaging CCS. Xerox filed a counterclaim alleging that CCS had infringed Xerox patents for various copier parts, Xerox copyrights for service manuals and Xerox trademarks associated with copying machines. This matter is before the Court on the Xerox Motion For Summary Judgment On…
2Cases cited107 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Council of Certified Podiatric Physicians and Surgeons v. American Board of Podiatric Surgery, Inc., American Podiatric Medical AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Harrison Aire, Inc. v. Aerostar International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- William A. Graham Co. v. HaugheyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007