Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Novelty Dye Works

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1956PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, C. J.

The contract of March 7, 1955, entered into by Eric Altnau with the Muellers for the sale of the property was a binding, written agreement between the vendor and bona fide purchasers, satisfying the statute of frauds. It was in no way affected by the subsequent docketing in Fond du Lac county of the judgment in favor of respondents Novelty Dye Works and Mercury Insurance Company. The agreement was signed March 7, 1955. The transcript of the judgment was not docketed in Fond du Lac county until April 26, 1955, fifty days after Muellers had signed the contract, made a $1,000 down payment, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Krakow v. WilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Williamson v. NeevesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Ritchie v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Bartz v. PaffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Western Lime & Cement Co. v. Copper River Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. Shia Ben-HurCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Foreclosure of Tax Liens Pursuant to Section 75.521 Wisconsin Statutes by Waukesha County v. YoungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. City of Milwaukee v. GreenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Atkinson v. AtkinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Cannefax v. ClementUtah Supreme Court · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API