Legal Opinion
Times-Union of Capital Newspaper Division of Hearst Corp. v. Harris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 13, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Firstly, we note that the respondents objected to the lack of capacity of the petitioners, originally named "Times Union of the Capitol Newspaper Group and Shirley Armstrong”. In petitioners’ reply to the answer, they seek leave to amend the caption to read "Times Union of the Capitol Division of the Hearst Corporation and Shirley Armstrong”. Since the objection to the caption is unrelated to the substantive issues and no prejudice will result, we grant leave to amend (CPLR 3025, subd [b]; 3026).
The petitioners, or one of them, were alerted on or about October 8, 1979 by…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Westchester Rockland Newspapers, Inc. v. LeggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Gannett Co. v. De PasqualeNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Capital Newspapers Group of Hearst Corp. v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Velez v. South Nine Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Gannett Co. v. WeidmanNew York Supreme Court · 1980
- Farina v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981