Gannett Co. v. De Pasquale
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*374OPINION OF THE COURT
Wachtler, J.
During the course of pretrial suppression hearings in a highly publicized murder 'caseT "the-eourt- directed that the evidentiary proceedings be closed to the public, including the press. The closure order was imposed as a means to ensure the defendants’ right to a fair trial by forestalling the prejudicial effects of further notoriety. In this article 78 proceeding in the nature of prohibition, the petitioner, a disseminator of news through press and television, claims that the court’s action violated First Amendment guarantees and the Sixth Amendment right to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.