Legal Opinion

Gannett Co. v. De Pasquale

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1977PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*374OPINION OF THE COURT

Wachtler, J.

During the course of pretrial suppression hearings in a highly publicized murder 'caseT "the-eourt- directed that the evidentiary proceedings be closed to the public, including the press. The closure order was imposed as a means to ensure the defendants’ right to a fair trial by forestalling the prejudicial effects of further notoriety. In this article 78 proceeding in the nature of prohibition, the petitioner, a disseminator of news through press and television, claims that the court’s action violated First Amendment guarantees and the Sixth Amendment right to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API