Legal Opinion
Puso v. Kenyon
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 10, 1994PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
272 N.J. Super. 280 (1994)
639 A.2d 1120
JEAN PUSO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN KENYON, SOOK Y. CHOI, ABC CORPORATION NO. 1, ABC CORPORATION NO. 2, ABC CORPORATION NO. 3, JOHN DOE NO. 1, JOHN DOE NO. 2, JOHN DOE NO. 3 (SAID NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS AND UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE), DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 25, 1994.
Decided March 10, 1994.
Before Judges PRESSLER, DREIER and KLEINER.
Neil B. Fink argued the cause for appellant (Fink & Fink, attorneys; Alfred J. Cozzi, on the brief).
William A. Wenzel argued…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- "Industrial America", Inc. v. Fulton Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1971
- Polk v. DaconceicaoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Superior Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gilhooley v. County of UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Johnson v. ScaccettiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Soto v. ScaringelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Gerber v. Springfield Bd. of Educ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Hammer v. Township of LivingstonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.