Legal Opinion

United States v. Villongco

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 11, 2016No. Criminal No. 2007-0009Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Case No. 07-009 (BAH) DAVID VILLONGCO, Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The defendant David Villongco, who is proceeding pro se, contests the government’s effort to garnish funds in his retirement and brokerage accounts in partial satisfaction of the defendant’s restitution obligation in the amount of $14,284,852.78. Def.’s Mot. to Quash the Writ of Continuing Non-Wage Garnishment, ECF No. 46 (“Def.’s Mot.”).1 This restitution obligation was ordered as part of a criminal judgment…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. United States v. Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Leona M. HelmsleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Francis BoccagnaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API