Legal Opinion

Howell v. Rushing

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 15, 1953No. 35397PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Vice Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs, as parents and the sole and only heirs of Howard Gaines flowell, deceased, brought this action for the benefit of the heirs and next of kin of decedent to recover damages allegedly sustained by them as a result of the death of decedent, their unborn child, which they allege was caused by the negligence of defendant. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the petition on the ground that the petition failed to state a cause of action. Defendant concedes that the petition is good against a demurrer except for the ground that “there is no right of action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Verkennes v. CornieaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Drabbels v. Skelly Oil Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Mid-Co Petroleum Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Smith v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Pino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. State Ex Rel. Odham v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Sinkler v. KnealeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API