Legal Opinion

Zepeda v. Zepeda

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 3, 1963No. Gen. 48,291PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE DEMPSEY

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff is the infant son of the defendant. He seeks damages from his father because he is an illegitimate child. He appeals from an order dismissing his suit and striking his complaint for its failure to state a cause of action.

Although the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint in the trial court, he did not contest this appeal. During the oral argument in this court Mr. Hugh M. Matchett, the plaintiff’s attorney, said he thought the defendant’s viewpoint should be represented. He suggested that Professor Max…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Knierim v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Smith v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Amann v. FaidyIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Bonbrest v. KotzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946
  5. Sinkler v. KnealeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Renslow v. Mennonite HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Turpin v. SortiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Gleitman v. CosgroveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API