Legal Opinion

Bracken v. Champlin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1923No. 24,814PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Phillips district court; Willakd Simmons, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff sued to recover $30,000 actual damages and $20,000 punitive damages for the alienation of the affections of her husband by the defendant. Verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff for $1. She appeals, and contends that the damages allowed were inadequate. The defendant makes no complaint. _ .

1. There was évidence' which tended to prove that the deféndant alienated from the plaintiff the affections of her husband. The jury must have believed that evidence. There was evidence which tended to prove that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nevins v. NevinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Sundgren v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. McCullough v. S. J. Hayde Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Thompson v. BurtisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Riggs v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Carlgren v. SaindonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Fenn v. Kansas Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Paul v. Western Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API