Lizama v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, Acting P. J.
The single issue is whether petitioner’s injury arose out of and occurred in the course of his employment. The referee found that it did and awarded medical and continuing temporary disability benefits; the appeals board held that it did not and vacated the award. His subsequent petition for reconsideration was denied by the board. On his petition for review we' issued a writ in discharge of the duty impliedly imposed upon this court to assure (1) that the referee’s finding of compensability was accorded the “great weight" to which it was entitled, and (2) that the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Lamb v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Page v. GreenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Ezzy v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Eckis v. Sea World Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Mason v. Lake Dolores Group, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Kennecott Corp. v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.