Legal Opinion

School District v. School District

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Linn : Henry H. Hewitt, Judge. Mandamus by School District No. 115 against School District No. 54, to compel defendant, from which plaintiff was created by a division of district No. 54, to act with it and the superintendent of schools in dividing assets and liabilities. There was judgment for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This is a proceeding by mandamus brought by the plaintiff, a school district created out of territory formerly embraced within the boundaries of the defendant district, to compel the defendant to appoint some disinterested person to act with the county superintendent and a like person chosen by the plaintiff, as a board of arbitrators, to make an equitable division between the plaintiff and defendant of the assets and liabilities of the defendant district at the time of the organization of plaintiff, as provided in Subd. 4, Section 2590, Hill’s Ann. Laws. The defense to the proceeding is that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trumbo v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. In re ShortSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. School District No. 25 v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. Voss v. Union School District No. 11Supreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. City of EstacadaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Portland General Electric Co. v. City of EstacadaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Portland General Electric Co. v. City of EstacadaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Waterman v. Southern Coos General Hospital DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API