Legal Opinion

In re Short

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1891PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Original Proceedings in Habeas Corpus. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion, filed at the session of the court in November, 1891.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

Two proceedings in habeas corpus have been instituted in this court, in each of which the validity of the organization of Garfield county is attempted to be challenged. In the first proceeding, it appears that Mrs. Cordelia Short was regulary charged in the district court of that county upon a criminal information with committing the offense of manslaughter in the first degree. She obtained a change of venue from that court to the district court of Hodgeman county, where she was tried and convicted, and sentenced to confinement in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. MaynardMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Brown v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
  3. Board of Commissioners v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Burt v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  5. State v. LeathermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Topeka v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Wright v. KelleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Babcock v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. In re NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API