Legal Opinion · Dissent

Portland General Electric Co. v. City of Estacada

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1952Published

1DissentBrand, C. J.

I dissent. I join in the opinion of Mr. Justice Lusk and shall not duplicate the able discussion of the authorities which appears in his opinion.

In the welter of authorities, pro and con, we are in danger of overlooking the reasons of public policy which underlie statutes and decisions relative to the methods by which the validity of annexations to cities may be tested. We will first consider what the plaintiff, being aggrieved by the proposed annexation, had a right to do in the protection of his interests. It is undisputed that the attempted annexation was undertaken pursuant to Chapter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McIver v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. City of Pendleton v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State Ex Rel. Security Savings & Trust Co. v. School District No. 9Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State Ex Rel. v. School District No. 23Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. State ex rel. Jackson v. Town of MansfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API