Marble v. Fred Hill & Son
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This is an appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, entered on April 27,1992, whereby the lower court granted appellees’'motion for reconsideration and reinstated its order of May 13, 1991, which denied appellant the opportunity to amend its new matter and assert the affirmative defense of the statute of limitations. Finding the order in question to be interlocutory, we quash this appeal and remand for trial.
Instantly, we review a record replete with procedural missteps, and a summary of the relevant procedural history is warranted. On May 8,1991,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Daywalt v. Montgomery HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Joyce v. Safeguard Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fernandez v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Benckini, G. v. Grant, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Fernandez v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Fernandez v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994