Legal Opinion

Rochette & Parzini Corp. v. Campo

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1950PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loughran, Ch. J.

The action is one for an injunction. The defendant union is a voluntary unincorporated association. It is sued in the name of its president pursuant to section 13 of the General Associations Law and is now the only party defendant. The plaintiff, a domestic corporation, is the appellant here. No “ labor dispute ” is involved. (See Opera on Tour, Inc., v. Weber, 285 N. Y. 348, 357.) For the sake of clarity we divide the case into two branches.(1) The defendant union controls within the metropolitan area of greater New York the supply of union labor that performs exterior work…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. CrumbochSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Opera on Tour, Inc. v. WeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. People v. GassmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rager v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Reinforce, Inc. v. BirneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Brandt v. WinchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Fieger v. Glen Oaks Village, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Reinman v. JaffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API