Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Crumboch
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 18, 1945No. 570PublishedCited by 146 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Me.'Justice Black
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The question here is whether an organization of laboring men violated the Sherman Act, as amended, 26 Stat. 209, 38 Stat. 730, by refusing to admit to membership petitioner’s employees, and by refusing to sell their services to petitioner, thereby making it impossible for petitioner profitably to continue in business.
For about fourteen years prior to 1939, the petitioner, a business partnership engaged in motor trucking, carried freight under a contract with the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (A & P). Eighty-five percent of the merchandise…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Richards v. Nielsen Freight LinesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1985
- Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- P. David Bailey v. Allgas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.