Legal Opinion
Brandt v. Winchell
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 23, 1958PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Conway.
The present appeal is taken by the plaintiff from an Appellate Division judgment which (1) reversed an order of Special Term denying the motion of defendant Elmer H. Bobst to dismiss the amended complaint as insufficient in law as against said defendant, (2) granted the motion and (3) dismissed the amended complaint as against said defendant, without leave to replead.
Two causes of actions are pleaded. The first cause, asserted against Winchell alone, charges Winchell with having committed certain alleged tortious acts. The second cause, asserted against Winchell, Bobst and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Andrew J. Aikens v. State of WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Opera on Tour, Inc. v. WeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Beardsley v. . KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Rager v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- ATI, Inc. v. Ruder & Finn, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Yang Feng Zhao v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Schoolcraft v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Broadway & 67th St. Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.