Legal Opinion

Fitz v. Rust-Oleum Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 2008No. 71A04-0704-CV-209PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Senior Judge.

Third-Party Plaintiffs/Defendants/Appellants Rust-Oleum Corporation and ROC Sales, Inc. (collectively “Rust-Ole-um”) appeal the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Third-Party Defendant/Appellee United States Can Company (U.S.Can).

We reverse in part, affirm in part and remand.

Rust-Oleum presents two issues for our review which we restate as:

I. Whether the trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of U.S. Can.

II. Whether the trial court erred by denying summary judgment for Rust-Oleum.

In 1992, Carl Fitz was injured while using a can of spray…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. INS Investigations Bureau, Inc. v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Pond v. McNellisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Lystarczyk v. SmitsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Winchell v. GuyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. GintherIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library v. Charlier Clark & Linard, PCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Alaska Seaboard Partners Ltd. Partnership v. HoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Continental Insurance Co. v. Wheelabrator Technologies, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Brian L. Spurlock, Sally M. Spurlock v. Morequity, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. P.S.S. ex rel. Smith v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API