Fitz v. Rust-Oleum Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Senior Judge.
Third-Party Plaintiffs/Defendants/Appellants Rust-Oleum Corporation and ROC Sales, Inc. (collectively “Rust-Ole-um”) appeal the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Third-Party Defendant/Appellee United States Can Company (U.S.Can).
We reverse in part, affirm in part and remand.
Rust-Oleum presents two issues for our review which we restate as:
I. Whether the trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of U.S. Can.
II. Whether the trial court erred by denying summary judgment for Rust-Oleum.
In 1992, Carl Fitz was injured while using a can of spray…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- INS Investigations Bureau, Inc. v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Pond v. McNellisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Lystarczyk v. SmitsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Winchell v. GuyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. GintherIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library v. Charlier Clark & Linard, PCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Alaska Seaboard Partners Ltd. Partnership v. HoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Wheelabrator Technologies, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Brian L. Spurlock, Sally M. Spurlock v. Morequity, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- P.S.S. ex rel. Smith v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.