Legal Opinion

Pond v. McNellis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 2006No. 02A05-0506-CV-341PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Judge.

William Pond appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment to - Paul McNellis and Linda Chrzan and denial of his motion for summary judgment. Pond raises one issue, which we revise and restate as whether the trial court erred by granting MecNellis and Chrzan's motion for summary judgment and denying Pond's motion for summary judgment concerning his request for restitution for attorney fees paid to McNellis and Chrzan, his ex-wife's attorneys. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The relevant facts follow. This is the fourth appeal concerning the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Bayh v. SonnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. The BANK OF THE UNITED STATES v. the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Dana Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Perry v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Kumar v. Bay Bridge, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. McGrath v. Everest National InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
  4. RIETH-RILEY CONST. CO., INC. v. GibsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. City of Crown Point v. Misty Woods Properties, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API