Legal Opinion

American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ginther

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 2004No. 71A05-0305-CV-214PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Garnishee-Defendant, American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American Family), appeals the trial court's order denying its Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment.

We affirm.

ISSUES

American Family raises three issues on appeal, which we restate as follows:(1) Whether the trial court abused its discretion by failing to estop Eugene H. Ginther, Mary Ginther, James O. Clay, and Emma Jean Clay (collectively, the "injured motorists") from re-litigating an insurance coverage question that had been litigated and dismissed with prejudice in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hammes v. BrumleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Peterson v. Culver Educational FoundationIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. BolesIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dunaway v. Allstate Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Microvote General Corp. v. Office of the Secretary of StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Whitman v. DenzikIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Fitz v. Rust-Oleum Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Bachman v. AMCO InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API