Legal Opinion
Taverna v. Hoboken
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 31, 1956PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
43 N.J. Super. 160 (1956)
128 A.2d 11
CHARLES TAVERNA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF HOBOKEN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 26, 1956.
Decided December 31, 1956.
Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. Bernard Chazen argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Baker, Garber & Chazen, attorneys; Mr. Nathan Baker, of counsel).
Mr. E. Norman Wilson argued the cause for respondent City of Hoboken (Mr. Robert F. McAlevy, Jr., City Attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.A.D.
Plaintiff's negligence action against the City of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Milstrey v. City of HackensackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Kelley v. CurtissSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Gentile v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Hartman v. City of BrigantineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Saco v. HallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chatman v. HallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Caltavuturo v. PassaicNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Ingram v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Kent v. County of HudsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Farkas v. Middlesex Board of FreeholdersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.