Ingram v. Salt Lake City
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Plaintiff Ronald L. Ingram appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Salt Lake City on grounds that the city was immune from suit under the Utah Governmental Immunity Act. We reverse for a trial on the merits.
Ingram was injured when he stepped on a manhole cover located on a parking strip between the sidewalk and the curb in the Sugarhouse area where the city had undertaken a beautification program. The cover gave way under Ingram’s weight, and he was trapped in the vault.
Salt Lake City had hired Okland Construction Company, which had performed the construction work in accordance with plans…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. MelbyUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Bowen v. Riverton CityUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Vincent v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Andrus v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- Apache Tank Lines, Inc. v. CheneyUtah Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wycalis v. Guardian Title of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Loveland v. Orem City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
- White v. DeseelhorstUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Berry v v. Greater Park City Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
- Pigs Gun Club, Inc. v. Sanpete CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.