Legal Opinion
Kent v. County of Hudson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 25, 1968PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
102 N.J. Super. 208 (1968)
245 A.2d 747
HAZEL KENT, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF JOHN F. CROSBY, DECEASED, AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN F. CROSBY, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
COUNTY OF HUDSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 13, 1968.
Decided July 25, 1968.
Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Lewis M. Holland argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Warren, Chasan, Leyner & Holland, attorneys).
Mr. Daniel F. Gilmore, Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Kelly, Jr.,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- McAndrew v. MularchukSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Amelchenko v. Borough of FreeholdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Jurman v. Samuel Braen, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- Hoy v. CapelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- B. W. King, Inc. v. Town of West New YorkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- O'CONNELL v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Stogsdill v. Manor Convalescent Home, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Willis v. Dept. of Cons. & Ec. Dev.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Winters v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Kent v. County of HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.