Legal Opinion
Farkas v. Middlesex Board of Freeholders
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 24, 1958PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
49 N.J. Super. 363 (1958)
139 A.2d 779
JOSEPH FARKAS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 17, 1958.
Decided March 24, 1958.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Robert N. Wilentz argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman, Spitzer & Sills, attorneys; Mr. Matthias D. Dileo, of counsel).
Mr. Samuel V. Convery argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Sam Weiss, on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.
Plaintiff appeals from a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Augustine v. Town of BrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Melone v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Milstrey v. City of HackensackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Hartman v. City of BrigantineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Amaru v. StrattonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Poland v. ParsekianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Terhune v. Margaret Hague Mat. Hosp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Shafer v. HB Thomas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Weeks v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.