Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. Naher

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1909No. 7463PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered January 28, 1908, upoh findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to foreclose a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— On January 16, 1907, the respondent loaned to the appellants the sum of $12,000, to become due three years after date, with interest at six per cent per an*592num, payable semi-annually. The note taken to evidence the loan provided that, in case the interest was not paid when due, the whole sum of both principal and interest should become immediately due, at the option of the holder of the note. At the time of the making and delivery of the note, and to secure the payment thereof according to its terms and conditions, the appellants also executed and delivered to the respondent a mortgage…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sanford v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Swearingen v. LahnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Lowenstein v. PhelanNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Ver Planck v. GodfreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. First National Bank v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Gunther v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  2. 4518 S. 256th, LLC v. Karen L. Gibbon, PSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Puget Sound Mutual Savings Bank v. LillionsWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Gunby v. IngramWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. AAC CORPORATION v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 1968

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API