Legal Opinion

Casto v. Evinger

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1897No. 2,114PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Yigo Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, C. J.

The complaint, in substance, alleges that on January 10,1879, one John H. Rippetoe, *299who was guardian of Peter Malcom, a person of unsound mind, loaned to appellant, Casto, $200.00 of his ward’s funds and took therefor a note executed by appellants, Casto and Wiseman; that the note was made payable to John H. Rippetoe as guardian of Peter Malcom; that the said ward died in 1891; that his estate was duly settled, and that thereafter Rippetoe delivered, without written assignment, the note to plaintiffs, who are the only heirs of the said ward, and who sue in this action as such heirs. The note…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Talmage v. ChapelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  2. Jackson School Township v. FarlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Biddle v. WilkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  4. Palmer v. PoorIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. McCoy v. LockwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Magel v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. International Bank of Coalgate v. Mullen MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Taylor v. RegerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Young v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Crawford v. SpindlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API