Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Brant

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1989No. Docket 101707, 103879PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

In this medical malpractice case, defendants Kern Hospital and Dr. Norman Brant appeal by leave granted from two circuit court orders denying their respective motions for summary disposition based upon the statute of limitations, MCR 2.116(C)(7). We reverse.

The issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred by denying defendants’ motions for summary disposition based upon the statute of limitations governing medical malpractice actions. The trial court denied the motions on the basis that there were material questions of fact regarding the date of discovery of the alleged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peterfish v. FrantzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Wallisch v. FosnaughMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Stroud v. WardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Antal v. PorrettaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Pendell v. JarkaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kaufman & Payton, PC v. NikkilaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Turner v. Mercy Hospitals & Health ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Simmons v. Apex Drug Stores, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Shelby Charter Township v. PapeshMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Kermizian v. SumcadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API