Legal Opinion

Antal v. Porretta

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 1987No. Docket 95751PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order dismissing their medical malpractice claim under MCR 2.116(C)(7). Plaintiffs argue on appeal that their action was filed within two years of the date of last treatment or within six months after discovery of the basis of a malpractice action. We affirm.

Plaintiff Ludwig Antal sought treatment with defendants on November 2, 1982, for a knee injury. Defendant Porretta was the treating physician. Surgery was performed on February 16, 1983. Plaintiff continued to see Dr. Porretta for postoperative care until July 26, 1983. About three days after his July…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heisler v. RogersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Walter Toebe & Co. v. Receiver of F Yeager Bridge & Culvert Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Juravle v. OzdaglerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Pendell v. JarkaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Bosel v. BabcockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morgan v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Griffith v. BrantMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Stapleton v. City of WyandotteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Weaver v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Carr v. WittingenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API