Legal Opinion

Kassowitz v. Sentinel Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1938PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The following paragraph contains the alleged libel:

“That theory is in practice at Muirdale, Coffey said, and there are a number of persons employed there, including part-time doctors, who are so-called arrested cases of tuberculosis. ...”

The appellant’s first contention is that the article, above quoted, sufficiently identifies the plaintiff to permit him to maintain the action. It is alleged in the complaint that at the time of the publication, there were, including plaintiff, four part-time doctors employed at the Muirdale sanitarium. The article states: “There are a number of persons…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shaw Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. Des Moines Dress ClubSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Judevine v. Benzies-Montanye Fuel & Warehouse Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Williams v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Helmicks v. StevlingsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Schoenfeld v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Martin v. Outboard Marine Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Neiman-Marcus v. LaitDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  3. Meier v. MeurerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Peabody v. BarhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Coats v. News CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API