Meier v. Meurer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
It is clear from the complaint that the publications complained of are true in large part. Plaintiffs assert, however, that the handbill and advertisement are capable of a meaning which is false and actionable, and that it is for the jury to decide whether the false and actionable meaning was conveyed to the readers.
Admittedly, there are several omissions or inaccuracies. The publications do not state who “ordered” the sale. They give the impression that all the items of equipment listed formerly belonged to Meier Bakery, although some of them did not. They may imply that the premises…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Judevine v. Benzies-Montanye Fuel & Warehouse Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Williams v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Leuch v. BergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Yoeckel v. SamonigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Kassowitz v. Sentinel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Lathan v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Frinzi v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Martin v. Outboard Marine Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Hirsch v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.