Schoenfeld v. Journal Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The plaintiff contends that the court erred in refusing to award judgment for the plaintiff upon the undisputed evidence for the amount of damages assessed by the jury notwithstanding the verdict of the jury which found the entire article as published not libelous. The basis of plaintiff’s contention is that the language found in the headlines, “Warrant for Pastor in Fur Thefts. Church Organ Cached Loot at Park Falls,” was libelous per se and was not a fair index of the concededly privileged article following.
While no warrant charging plaintiff with larceny had been issued, it is undisputed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hayes v. Press Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Brown v. Globe Printing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Arnold v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Landon v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Shubert v. Variety, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Converters Equipment Corp. v. Condes Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Frinzi v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Noral v. Hearst Publications, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Williams v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Ledger-Enquirer Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.