Legal Opinion
California Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1986No. 81-7809PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MODIFIED OPINION
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
Respondent Bonneville Power Administration is a self-financing power marketing agency within the United States Department of Energy. Since the enactment of the Bonneville Project Act of 1937, 16 U.S.C. §§ 832-832Z, it has marketed the inexpensive hydroelectric power generated by facilities along the Columbia River. BPA sells electric power to numerous utilities, both publicly owned and private-investor owned, as well as to direct service industrial and government customers, primarily in the Pacific Northwest.
In 1980, Congress adopted the Pacific Northwest…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative v. Dept. of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- California Energy Resources Conservation And Development Commission v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Apac v. BpaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Coos-Curry Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. James J. JuraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.