Legal Opinion

Weihing v. Dodsworth

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 13, 2007No. AC 27039PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The plaintiff, Thomas J. Weihing, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion of the defendant Ronald W. Dodsworth to dismiss the complaint for improper service. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that (1) the defendant was immune from service of process and (2) he was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following procedural history and allegations set forth in the plaintiffs complaint are relevant to our discussion. The defendant previously had commenced a…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Ferreira v. PringleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rosa v. Lawrence & Memorial HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. State v. DEJESUSConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Ungerland v. MORGAN STANLEY AND CO., INC.Connecticut Superior Court · 2010
  4. Patriot National Bank v. BravermanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Lawrence v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API