Legal Opinion
Madias v. Dearborn Federal Credit Union
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 31, 1996No. Civil Action No. 96-40043PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GADOLA, District Judge.
Plaintiff requests this court to hold that the Federal Credit Union Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 1751-1795k (hereinafter “the Act”), is violated by one of defendant’s bylaws which restricts who may run for election to defendant’s board of directors (hereinafter “the Board”). The facts are undisputed. Both sides have moved for summary judgment. For the following reasons, this court will grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
I. Factual Background
Members of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sly v. DFCU FINANCIAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006