Sly v. DFCU FINANCIAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ZATKOFF, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (docket # 11), filed on June 26, 2006. Plaintiffs have responded, and Defendants have replied to the response. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ papers and the decision process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion be resolved on the briefs submitted. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.