In re Tyler
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
—From the return to the writ issued in this proceeding it appears, that the petitioner has been imprisoned under an order of commitment, made by the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, for a contempt of court, of which he has been adjudged guilty and sentenced to pay a fine of five hundred dollars, or be imprisoned until payment of the fine at the rate of two dollars per day for every day’s imprisonment.
The order was made by a court of competent jurisdiction, and the only questions arising out of the return are whether the act for which the petitioner has been adjudged…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City & County of San Francisco v. Spring Valley Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by21 opinions
- Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- H. J. Heinz Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- In Re GarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.